Cross-licensing appears to be pro-competitive rather than anti-competitive; But I think a particular cross-license could impose requirements not to deal with others, and that could actually be anti-competitive. What is a cross-license agreement? How big software c. Do cross-licensing agreements create a number of important advantages: so, what can be wrong with all these cross-licensing advantages? Here are some of the disadvantages that companies considering cross-licensing on intellectual property should consider: Major players in all sectors, especially in the automotive, telecommunications, broadcasting and pharmaceutical sectors, are interconnected through cross-licensing agreements. The problem seems to be that a market player essentially has to license the entire portfolio of each major player in the industry to enter the industry. Without its own patents as a bargaining chip, the costs are prohibitive. The cost is not based on existing cross-licensing. The main activity of a patent holding company is to license patents for a financial royalty. Therefore, they do not need rights to exercise the patents of other companies. These companies are often pejoratively referred to as patent trolls. Cross-licensing agreements are royalty-free, which means the company can save extra money. The benefits usually outweigh the negative aspects of the cost, but it`s important to remember that these are legally binding contracts you enter into with your competitor.
From this case, any company considering this path should immediately consult a lawyer. .