The name Courtsy Officer was first accepted in the 1980s by the Texas Apartment Association`s lawyer. This lawyer for the association asked property owners and managers to believe that the appointment of a uniformed security guard as a “polite officer” would somehow reduce their civil liability. Don`t praise bad courtesy officer candidates! A “courtesy officer” is a concept of the housing industry that generally describes the title of a person who, after hours of office, performs a visible protective function on a dwelling. The things to keep in mind While the tasks of contract custody are managed outside, courtesy officers go under the roof of property management and do not have a predefined set of functions. Property managers who choose to hire a courtesy officer should ensure that they clearly define accountability for all expected and agreed-upon tasks. This can exceed the central safety features and encompass everything from checking outdoor lighting to ensuring that facilities – such as the pool and laundry – are in order. Many property managers mistakenly believe that the use of the title of “courtesy officer” reduces their responsibility in the event of a crime. According to LPT Security Consulting, this is an illusion. Regardless of what you call, courtesy persons are a security measure and should be considered as such by management and residents. What is a courtesy officer? Although their names are very different, courtesy officers and security guards perform the same basic functions: to ensure the safety of roommates. As a general rule, courtesy agents are employed directly by property management companies and may be equipped with on-site accommodation or reduced rent as part of their work. As they live on the site, they are often familiar with residents and real estate, as well as readily available when a problem arises. You can also wear more discreet clothing, such as a simple polo shirt, unlike the typical uniform of a security personnel.
The lawyer said the word “security guard” implied that an apartment in Texas took legal responsibility for the safety of its occupants and was therefore potentially responsible for criminal acts that injured those residents.